Ang Ladlad LGBT vs. COMELEC

ANG LADLAD LGBT PARTY represented herein  by its  Chair,  DANTON  REMOTO,  Petitioner,  versus-  COMMISSION ON ELECTIONS,  Respondent. G.R. No. 190582, EN BANC, April 8, 2010, DEL CASTILLO, J. Rather than relying on religious belief, the government must act for secular purposes and in ways that have primarily secular effects. Here, Ang Ladlad has sufficiently demonstrated… Continue reading Ang Ladlad LGBT vs. COMELEC

Air Canada vs. CIR

AIR CANADA, Petitioner, -versus- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. G.R.  No.  169507,  SECOND DIVISION,  January 11,  2016,  LEONEN,  J. The Philippines “adopts the generally accepted principles of international law as part of the law of the land.” Hence, pursuant to Article 8 of the Republic of the Philippines-CanadaTax Treaty, Air Canada may only be imposed… Continue reading Air Canada vs. CIR

Magallona vs. Ermita

PROF. MERLIN M. MAGALLONA vs EDUARDO ERMITA G.R No.  187167,  July  16,  2011,  Carpio RA 9522 is a Statutory Tool to Demarcate the Country’s Maritime Zones and Continental Shelf Under UNCLOS III, not to Delineate Philippine Territory. FACTS: R.A. 3046 was passed demarcating the maritime baselines of the Philippines. After five decades, RA 9552 was… Continue reading Magallona vs. Ermita

Lambino vs. COMELEC

RAUL L. LAMBINO and ERICO B. AUMENTADO, TOGETHER WITH 6,327,952 REGISTERED VOTERS v. COMELEC G.R. No. 174153, October 25, 2006, CARPIO, J. Two essential elements must be present: the people must author and sign the entire proposal and it must be embodied in a petition. These are present only if the full text of the… Continue reading Lambino vs. COMELEC

Santiago vs. COMELEC

MIRIAM DEFENSOR SANTIAGO, ALEXANDER PADILLA, and MARIA ISABEL ONGPIN v. Comelec, JESUS DELFIN, ALBERTO & CARMEN PEDROSA, as founding members of PIRMA G.R.  No.  127325,  March  19,  1997,  DAVIDE,  JR.,  J. Section 2 of Article XVII of the Constitution is not self-executory. While the Constitution has recognized or granted that right, the people cannot exercise… Continue reading Santiago vs. COMELEC

Manila Prince Hotel vs. GSIS

MANILA PRINCE HOTEL vs. GSIS, MANILA HOTEL CORPORATION, COMMITTEE ON PRIVATIZATION, OFFICE OF THE GOVERNMENT CORPORATE COUNSEL G.R.  No.  122156,  February 3,  1997,  BELLOSILLO,  J. Adhering to the doctrine of constitutional supremacy, the subject constitutional provision is, as it should be, impliedly written in the bidding rules issued by respondent GSIS, lest the bidding rules… Continue reading Manila Prince Hotel vs. GSIS

Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, et al.

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES, Petitioner, vs. SANDIGANBAYAN, MAJOR GENERAL JOSEPHUS Q. RAMAS and ELIZABETH DIMAANO, Respondents. G.R. No. 104768; July 21, 2003 En Banc Ponente: Carpio The Bill of Rights under the 1973 Constitution was not operative during the interregnum. However, the protection accorded to individuals under the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and… Continue reading Republic vs. Sandiganbayan, et al.

Pamatong vs. COMELEC

Pamatong vs. Commission on Elections GR No. 161872 April 13, 2004 FACTS: When the petitioner, Rev. Elly Velez Pamatong, filed his Certificate of Candidacy for Presidency, the Commision on Elections (COMELEC) refused to give the petition its due course. Pamatong requested a case for reconsideration. However, the COMELEC again denied his request. The COMELEC declared… Continue reading Pamatong vs. COMELEC

Pamatong vs. COMELEC

FACTS:  Petitioner Pamatong filed his Certificate of Candidacy (COC) for President. Respondent COMELEC declared petitioner and 35 others as nuisance candidates who could not wage a nationwide campaign and/or are not nominated by a political party or are not supported by a registered political party with a national constituency. Pamatong filed a Petition For Writ of… Continue reading Pamatong vs. COMELEC

PLDT vs. NTC

PLDT vs. NTC GR 88404, 18 October 1990; En Banc, Melencio-Herrera (J) Facts: On 22 June 1958, RA 2090 was enacted granting Felix Alberto & Co. (later ETCI) a franchise to establish radio stations for domestic and transoceanic telecommunications. On 13 May 1987, ETCI filed an application with the NTC for the issuance of a… Continue reading PLDT vs. NTC

PLDT vs. NTC

Philippine Long Distance Telephone Co. vs National Telecommunications Commission190 SCRA 717 [GR No. 88404 October 18, 1990] Facts: On June 22, 1958, Republic Act No. 2090, was enacted otherwise known as “An Act Granting Felix Alberto and Company, Incorporated, a franchise to establish radio stations for domestic and transoceanic telecommunications.” Felix Alberto & Co. Inc. was… Continue reading PLDT vs. NTC

Marine Radio Communications vs. Reyes

MARINE RADIO COMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION OF THE PHILIPPINES INC. vs. REYES Petitioners are self-described enterpreneurs. They provide ship to ship and shore to shore public marine coastal radio stations. In July, DTC unveiled their own system (SOLAS) to ensure the safety of lives at sea. It was set to provide the same services free of charge.… Continue reading Marine Radio Communications vs. Reyes

Basco vs. PAGCor

Basco vs Philippine Amusements and Gaming Corporation197 SCRA 52 GR No. 91649 May 14, 1991 Facts: A TV ad proudly announces: “The New PAGCOR – Responding Through Responsible Gaming.” But the petitioners think otherwise, that is why, they filed the instant petition seeking to annul the PAGCOR charter – PD 1869, because it is allegedly contrary… Continue reading Basco vs. PAGCor

Basco vs. PAGCor

G.R. No. 91649             May 14, 1991 ATTORNEYS HUMBERTO BASCO, EDILBERTO BALCE, SOCRATES MARANAN AND LORENZO SANCHEZ,petitioners, v. PHILIPPINE AMUSEMENTS AND GAMING CORPORATION (PAGCOR), respondent. Re: Principle of Local Autonomy FACTS: The PH Amusement and Gaming Corp. was created by PD 1067-A and granted a franchise under PD 1067-B. Subsequently, under PD 1869,… Continue reading Basco vs. PAGCor

Tondo Medical Center vs. CA

Tondo Medical Center et al. vs. the Court of Appeals, et al. 2007-07-17 | G.R. No. 167324 PETITIONERS: Tondo Medical Center Employees Association, et al., RESPONDENTS: The Court of Appeals Executive Secretary Alberto G. Romulo Secretary of Health Manuel M. Dayrit Secretary of Budget And Management Emilia T. Boncodin PONENTE: Chico – Nazario, J. FACTS:… Continue reading Tondo Medical Center vs. CA

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started